Browse

Reference

Directory

Company

Help & Legal

Follow

Subscribe

Quick Take

Binance's tracked ERC-20 stablecoin reserves stand near $32 billion after a substantial contraction, giving traders a reason to test the exchange's remaining buying capacity against actual Bitcoin orders. A November 10 comparison with OKX showed Binance had a higher total value of nearby Bitcoin buy orders in one narrow slice of the market, even as its tracked stablecoin balance remained below October levels.

Community analyst Novaque Research via CryptoQuant put the balance at roughly $32 billion on Nov. 10, down from about $41 billion to $42 billion in late October. Its reserve comparison also put OKX near $9 billion, with balances trending lower there. That offers little support for a simple reading that Binance's lost tracked reserves have reappeared at that rival.

Bitcoin was trading around $74,000 on Nov. 10. Coinbase's BTC-USD ticker recorded a last trade of $74,056 at 10:41:58 UTC. The reserve observations arrive after the Oct. 29 hack at Binance and subsequent reopening of withdrawals, which CryptoSlate covered last week.

Binance reports $11 billion withdrawn in 46 hours as Zhao says few funds went to rivals

In a separate Nov. 9 post, community analyst oinonen_t via CryptoQuant reported a 25.6% decline in Binance's ERC-20 stablecoin reserves from an early-October starting point to 32 billion units. The same analysis reported a smaller 7.6% drop in Bitcoin reserves to approximately 673,000 BTC.

Those figures suggest a larger proportional retreat in the tracked stablecoin balance. However, they use an early-October comparison, while Novaque's latest post refers to late October. The exact synchronized dates and wallet coverage are unspecified, so combining them would overstate what is known about the effect of the hack.

There is also a network boundary. ERC-20 balances exclude stablecoins held on other networks. Novaque cautions that wallet restructuring and cross-chain transfers may explain part of the contraction. CryptoSlate's earlier reporting on Binance's Tether routing likewise showed why a decline in identified Ethereum balances does not establish an equivalent withdrawal of customer dollars.

Bitcoin traders could mistake this Binance data change for a rush to sell

CryptoQuant defines exchange reserves as coins held in exchange addresses and describes stablecoin reserves as potential buying power. Potential matters here: an inventory figure does not say how much is being offered to buy Bitcoin at a particular price.

What the Bitcoin order books show

Around 10:42 UTC on Nov. 10, a snapshot of Binance's public BTC-USDT book showed approximately 1,980,000 USDT of displayed buy orders within 5 basis points, or 0.05%, below its midpoint. The near-contemporaneous OKX book showed about 980,000 USDT within the same width below its own midpoint.

The midpoint is halfway between the highest buy price and lowest sell price. Summing each eligible buy order's price multiplied by its Bitcoin quantity gives the quoted USDT value. Both returned books extended beyond the measured band, allowing a complete comparison at that width. The amounts are in USDT, distinct from Coinbase's US-dollar trade.

Binance therefore displayed more buying interest at those nearby prices in this sample. But orders can change before execution, and one pair of observations cannot establish enduring depth, deterioration from an earlier period or a return to pre-hack conditions. It measures what was displayed then, rather than how much Bitcoin buyers actually purchased.

Binance's balances and Bitcoin orders

Switch between tracked ERC-20 stablecoins and near-price Bitcoin buy orders.

Compare the measures

Approximate balances on one network, with several possible uses.

Buy orders within 5 bp below each venue's own midprice. One November 10 sample; values in USDT.

A large reserve balance does not reveal the amount committed to Bitcoin orders.

ERC-20 inventory excludes other networks. No pre-hack depth baseline or execution series is available; these views cannot establish restored liquidity.

Sources

Supporting facts

Method

Reserve bars use Novaque's approximate November 10 ERC-20 balances, with a zero-based 35 billion USD scale. Order bars use a calculation of the sum of price times BTC quantity within 5 bp below each venue's own midprice, rounded to 0.01 million USDT on a zero-based 2.1 million USDT scale. The upper diagram shows the measurement window, not order sizes. Panel scales and scopes differ.

Scope

Customer backing answers another question. Binance says its proof of reserves concerns assets held in custody for users. That measure does not identify which balances customers have committed to Bitcoin buy orders. Customer inventory, Binance's corporate resources and posted buying orders cannot be treated as one interchangeable pool.

Binance warns of second wave of crypto theft as $6.3 billion hack recovery continues

The order-book snapshot preceded the scheduled US inflation release. The Bureau of Labor Statistics calendar listed October CPI for Nov. 10 at 8:30 a.m. Eastern, or 13:30 UTC.

For holders assessing a rebound, stronger executed spot buying alongside buy orders that are replaced as sellers execute would challenge the concern that the smaller tracked stablecoin balance means impaired trading liquidity. Continued reserve contraction accompanied by persistently thinner depth at comparable widths would strengthen that concern.

Mentioned in this article

Binance CFO leaves the company to tokenize real assets

Cookie Consent

We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.

Cookie Preferences

Manage your cookie preferences below:

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.

CloudFlare provides web performance and security solutions, enhancing site speed and protecting against threats.

Service URL: developers.cloudflare.com (opens in a new window)

Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.

Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.

Clarity is a web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Service URL: clarity.microsoft.com (opens in a new window)

You can find more information in our Privacy Policy and .

Loading image…

This image could not be loaded.

The Catalyst